4Hoteliers
SEARCH
ITB 2025 Special Reporting
SHARE THIS PAGE
NEWSLETTERS
CONTACT US
SUBMIT CONTENT
ADVERTISING
Who Owns Your Company's Social Media Account – You, Or One Of Your Employees?
By Arthur Lambert 
Tuesday, 12th April 2016
 

Employers have been asking an important question with more frequency in recent times: who owns the company’s social media account â€" the employer or the employee running the account? 

Business social media accounts often contain a lot of pertinent and valuable information, and unfettered access to that account could give a departing employee a fast head start towards competing with you. 

While the last few years have seen a slew of litigation about these issues, there has been a scarcity of reported decisions by courts. One such decision is a recent federal court opinion from Illinois in the case of CDM Media USA, Inc. v. Simms. Although the court’s decision doesn’t settle any issues, it does highlight some important steps you can take to safeguard your information. 

Control Of LinkedIn Group In Question

When Robert Simms was an employee of CDM, a marketing and media services company, he was the contact person for a special LinkedIn group started by the company containing its customers and potential customers.

After Simms left the company, CDM wanted the group contact switched over to one of its current employees. It also demanded that Simms relinquish any names, addresses, conversations, etc., garnered from the LinkedIn account. Simms refused to turn over the information.

CDM sued Simms for breach of contract, misappropriation, and violation of the state’s trade secret act. The ex-employee responded by asserting that the company had no property rights to the information. He claimed that he was not contractually required to transfer the information because transfer of control of the LinkedIn group was not covered by the confidentiality provision in his non-compete agreement. He also argued that the LinkedIn group account and pertinent communications did not fall under the state’s trade secrets act, and thus were not subject to a claim under that statute. 

Lack Of Definitive Agreement Led To Confusion

Simms filed a motion to dismiss, asking the court to toss out the claim. The judge split the baby on the motion but essentially left all causes of action intact. In making his ruling, the judge noted that the ownership or control of the LinkedIn group account was not nailed down by the company in any agreement or policy it had relating to Simms or any other employee. If the company had created some concrete proof of ownership, the unresolved factual issues described by the judge’s opinion would not exist.

Other Cases Starting To Crop Up

The CDM case is not the only case of its kind that provides guidance for employers on how to best protect your social media accounts. There have been other lawsuits where at least part of the legal claim at issue is ownership of a company social media account.

In a California case, a Twitter feed was found to be company property because of the time and expense the company put into developing and maintaining the account (PhoneDog v. Kravitz). Also, in a New York case, a court held that a social media account was owned by the company due to a written agreement which provided for ownership (Ardis Health, LLC v. Nankivell).

Lessons To Be Learned

At the very least, you should develop a social media policy that addresses issues including retention of company social media accounts, account information, and communications. You should ensure that all of your employees sign the policy. As part of the policy, make clear that any posting on company social media is the property of the company along with the accounts, the names, etc., associated with the accounts. 

Further, the policy should clearly state that when an employee leaves, all account information and communications are to be transferred back to the company. Further, the policy should describe what, if any, information you consider to be confidential. This way, when an employee leaves, the account information stays with your company.  

Of course, if you have an employment agreement, you should consider including these provisions in the “Confidentiality” section and inserting a clause requiring the return of all information and cooperation in the transfer of any company accounts. This will at least let your employees know where they stand if they leave the company and will provide you with extra ammunition to keep your information where it belongs. 

Final Warning

Before finalizing any policy, you need to keep in mind that several states have enacted statutes that limit the interception and monitoring of social media. Laws are different across state lines, but a typical one can be found in California, where you are prohibited from requiring or requesting employees or applicants to disclose their username or password for their social media account.

Many state laws also prohibit you from requiring the employees or applicants to access their social media account in your presence. However, in many states, you may make a reasonable request that an employee divulge personal social media account information if it is relevant to an investigation of employee misconduct.

Because of the varied obligations you face across the country, you need to stay up-to-date on all the developments in the states in which you do business, particularly if you operate in multiple jurisdictions. 

A version of this article originally appeared at the Fisher & Phillips Non-Compete and Trade Secrets blog, which can be found by visiting noncompetenews.com.

Art Lambert is a Partner in the firm's Dallas office. On behalf of employer clients, Art regularly counsels and litigates employment law matters including sexual harassment, discrimination charges, wrongful termination, and FLSA disputes. He appears frequently before federal and state courts, administrative tribunals, and arbitrators. Art has extensive experience in all facets of litigation, including pre-trial motion practice, bench and jury trials, as well as specialized hearings and appeals. He defends collective (class) actions, multi-plaintiff lawsuits, and handles injunction proceedings. Art also litigates disputes that arise under employment agreements, including non-competition and customer non-solicitation disputes.

Art is a frequent speaker at business and professional conferences on various employment-related topics, and is widely published.

Art is board-certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, AV rated byMartindale Hubbell, identified among the top employment lawyers in the United States by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business in 2010-2011 and 2013-2015, and has been listed in Texas Super Lawyers from 2006-2015.

For more information, contact the author at ALambert@laborlawyers.com or 214.220.8324.

www.laborlawyers.com 

Global Brand Awareness & Marketing Tools at 4Hoteliers.com ...[Click for More]
 Latest News  (Click title to read article)




 Latest Articles  (Click title to read)




 Most Read Articles  (Click title to read)




~ Important Notice ~
Articles appearing on 4Hoteliers contain copyright material. They are meant for your personal use and may not be reproduced or redistributed. While 4Hoteliers makes every effort to ensure accuracy, we can not be held responsible for the content nor the views expressed, which may not necessarily be those of either the original author or 4Hoteliers or its agents.
© Copyright 4Hoteliers 2001-2025 ~ unless stated otherwise, all rights reserved.
You can read more about 4Hoteliers and our company here
Use of this web site is subject to our
terms & conditions of service and privacy policy